Construction Forum

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811254809
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3148802063
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$488,686
Expenses
$507,479
Assets
$48,152
Liabilities
$249

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY R MURPHY (PRESIDENT)
  • SHONNAH PAREDES (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • DIANA WILHOLD (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS FINAN (SECRETARY): $135,000 total reported compensation
  • DIANA WILHOLD (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $127,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To facilitate the collaboration of all the stakeholders in the stl region's build environment in creating inclusive, robust employment and economic growth.

What it reported doing in 2024

To facilitate the collaboration of all the stakeholders in the stl region's built environment in creating inclusive, robust employment and economic growth."the organization strives to be a "room without walls" where the entireconstruction industry can participate in building relationships andworking on issues large & small. We believe that when the constructioncommunity comes together to network, discuss ideas, and shareinformation we are all better for it.the organization encourages the forging of relationships and theexchange of ideas in a communal setting by scheduling and organizingplanned educational quarterly events. These events function as bothnetworking and speaker events in order to bring the construction industry and the greater community together to discuss current events and accomplishments in the local construction landscape, cultivate forward-thinking industry ideas, and resolve tough issues likediversity, workforce development, contract environment, and laborproblems. Since the organization does not have any members and there isno cost to attendees, there are no limitations as to who can participate in the forum's programming.the organization operates and maintains two websites, www.constructforstl.org and www.yeahibuilthat.org.our www.constructforstl.org website is designed to aggregate bothoriginal content and content from other sources to disseminate relevantinformation and build relationships within the local constructionindustry. The website also includes a moderated comment/reply option that anyone is allowed to participate in. This website is strictly moderated by the organization to ensure that an unbiased environment is presented and no political or advocacy activity is promoted through the website. The organization plans to grow the scope of the website byincluding videos of the scheduled events, interviews, and special projects in the future that build a more diverse and inclusive conversation in establishing and maintaining a welcoming work environment.the www.yeahibuiltthat.org website was designed to attract the educators, learners, parents, skilled apprenticeship training centers, workforce development and industry leaders as a "go to" for steps to take and resoruces available to get involved and learn about the industry.the organization also produces a biweekly newsletter to share recent construction news, current job listings, and upcoming industry events.the purpose of this newsletter is to further the spread of vitalindustry-related knowledge and information to those in the community to encourage further discussion. Anyone can join the mailing list for this newsletter free of charge.construction forum is a "member-less organization that serves as a convener, collaboration builder, and communication channel, enabling public discourse and focused action on issues related to diversity/inclusion, workforce, regionalism, and collaboration. The organization has no agenda, save information and civil discourse, and so supports no political agendas, by intent. The organization has impacted areas as diverse as regional collaboration, opioids in the workforce, careers for youth and adults from at-risk backgrounds, and immigrants/refugees. It has received local and national media coverage and awards for work in regionalism, diversity/inclusion, public policy, immigrants/refugees, and opioids in the workplace.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.2%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 47
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.2% of revenue deployed · 47.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $241K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $135K · 24 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.