Constantine Properties Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431578098
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Crestwood, MO, USA
Phone
3147172252
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,263
Expenses
$22,539
Assets
$177,597

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

First: to acquire, hold , lease and convey such real and/or personal property for the purpose of furnishing financial aid and assistance in the education of students with the theta iota chapter of the sigma chi fraternity at saint louis university. Access to study facilities including a study room are providedsecond: to cultivate fraternal relations among alumni, professors and active members of the theta iota chapter of the sigma chi fraternitythird: to cultivate fraternal relations among alumni, professors and active members of all chapters of the sigma chi fraternityfourth: to advance and promote the general interests of the sigma chi fraternity

What it reported doing in 2012

Four fraternity members leased during the calendar year of 2012. All members had moved out of hte building before june, 2012, and the fraternity house was put up for sale, with the sale closing on january 14, 2013. No social activities were sponsored for the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -428.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.88; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -61.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.