Constable Hall Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161010339
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Constableville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3153972323
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- History Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $234,495
- Expenses
- $133,835
- Assets
- $668,460
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY CROUCH (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LORAINE ODONNELL (EXECUTIVE DI): $22,880 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Constable hall association's mission statement is to hold, maintain, and preserve constable hall and grounds; acquire, collect, exhibit, and preserve articles of historic interest used in or related to constable hall; maintain a memorial to those persons who fought to preserve our country as a free and united nation; promote interest in the history of lewis county in cooperation with others. To these ends, we maintain an active accession process for those individuals who wish to donate items of local historic interest to constable hall. There are one, three, and five-year plans for the maintenance of the buildings, grounds, and artifacts. Annual events are hosted, as well as regular tours, to engage the community with the story of the hall. An area is set aside for military recognition.
What it reported doing in 2024
Maintain a historical mansion known for its place in local and state history. The premises serves as a museum for the locality and is available for all to visit. Events include an annual craft fair and car show, death and drinks, school educational trips, servant's day, indigenous people's month.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.99; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $23K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.