Conservative Alliance for Solar Energy I
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813921648
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Goodyear, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6236068846
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $22,725
- Assets
- $1,123
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DRURY BACON (President)
People named in this filing
- DRURY BACON (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Purpose for which this corporation is formed is to promote solar electric energy in all its manifestations including education, promotion, development and deployment to residents of Arizona. Such purpose will include organizing and conducting meetings for the purpose of solar awareness, solar education and examples of successful solar installations conducting public speaking presentations to civic clubs, churches and public events recruiting and organizing citizens to attend and testify at public meetings conducting meetings with Arizona business and government leaders and distributing literature about promoting solar energy as an economically and environmentally desirable technology.
What it reported doing in 2020
We have been able to organize and conduct meetings for solar energy awareness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -38.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -111.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -86.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.