Conservation Through Public Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371455761
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Holly Springs, NC, USA
Phone
9194495703
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,274,596
Expenses
$1,251,753
Assets
$788,429
Liabilities
$332,242

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dr Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka (Chief Executive Officer)

Highest reported compensation

  • Dr Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka (Chief Executive Officer): $69,709 total reported compensation
  • Mary Leakey (Development Director): $35,294 total reported compensation
  • Kaamu Bukenya (Finance and Administration Manager): $25,138 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Conservation Through Public Health (CTPH) promotes biodiversity conservation by enabling people, gorillas and other wildlife to coexist through improving their health and community livelihoods in and around Africa's protected areas. CTPH has three integrated programs: wildlife health and conservation, community health, and alternative livelihoods implemented through service delivery, education and behavior change communication, research, advocacy, social enterprises and information, communication, and technology (ICT). CTPH champions a One Health and conservation or integrated Population, Health and Environment (PHE) approach that addresses human, animal, and ecosystem health together. CTPH's work primarily focuses on critically endangered gorillas at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and other protected areas in Africa where gorillas naturally occur. We also train and advocate for other organizations to adopt our One Health model in savannah and mountain ecosystems in Uganda.

What it reported doing in 2024

ADVOCACY AND RESEARCH GOAL 4: INCREASE UPTAKE OF ONE HEALTH APPROACHES IN ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPORTANT LANDSCAPES. Results: The One Health approach is adopted, scaled, and mainstreamed into policy and development plans by communities and institutions. Activities: In November 2024, CTPH held a stakeholder's workshop at the Gorilla Conservation Camp in Bwindi to highlight the achievements of the One Health Model Household and VHCT initiatives, sharing best practices that have improved health, conservation, and community support around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and reflect on lessons learned throughout the program implementation, open a discussion on the challenges we've faced and the lessons we've learned along the way, helping us improve and adapt for the future and also gathered Stakeholder Recommendations for Future Program improvement. Participants shared their insights and recommendations which will help us shape the next steps and make these programs even more effective and sustainable. The event brought together 45 stakeholders, including representatives from local government, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), local NGOs, and health centers' in-charge officers. CTPH proudly joined the global community, Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) and our partners to celebrate World Gorilla Day (WGD). The main celebration was held at Uganda Nursing School Bwindi in the Buhoma Sector of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, themed "Celebrating the Success of Gorilla Conservation in Uganda." In the lead-up to World Gorilla Day, we hosted an exciting quiz competition on September 22, 2024, at the Gorilla Conservation Camp, engaging ten primary schools around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. The quiz was not just about gorillas; it covered key general topics that impact the gorillas including climate change, wildlife knowledge, and environmental conservation. It was a fantastic opportunity for young minds to learn about wildlife while embracing healthy competition. Teams of four two boys and two girls faced off in multiple rounds of questions, from basic to advanced. Wildlife Clubs of Uganda helped in planning for the quiz and Uganda Wildlife Conservation Education Centre (UWEC) developed the quiz and moderated the competition. In collaboration with UWA and the Bwindi Community Tour Operators and Hotel Owners Association, we held lively radio talk shows on Voice of Kigezi and Radios Kanungu FM discussing gorillas' ecological significance, their behaviors, threats to their habitats, and ways to combat these challenges, reaching a broad audience across the region In September 2024, CTPH participated in the 2024 African Primatological Society (APS) congress held in South Africa where our Monitoring Evaluation and Learning Coordinator, Ebenezer Paul gave an oral presentation about our work in Promoting Gorilla Conservation Through a One Health Model Household Approach at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (BINP), southwestern Uganda. Our Founder and CEO, Dr. Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka who is also the current Vice President of APS was a panelist at the Congress in a discussion about decolonization of African primatology. Through the hard work of APS, we are seeing more African representation at top levels in the conservation power structure, a much-needed stride since Africa has the highest number of primate species. In November 2024, CTPH, in collaboration with Florida International University, Kasisi Project, Ngogo Chimpanzee Project, and funded by Arcus Foundation, conducted a comprehensive training program aimed at bolstering the skills of various stakeholders in Great Ape tourism. These workshops took place in two renowned Great Ape Tourism locations: Kibale National Park and Budongo Forest Reserve. The training encompassed a diverse group of participants, including trackers, habituators, ranger guides, forest supervisors, patrolmen, and ecotourism supervisors. The primary objective of these workshops was to improve disease prevention mea

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.