Conservation International
Legal name: Conservation International Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521497470
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Arlington, VA, United States
- Phone
- +1 703-341-2400
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $308,673,004
- Expenses
- $316,690,413
- Assets
- $703,564,053
- Liabilities
- $279,248,759
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
47 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SANJAYAN MUTTULINGAM (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- SANJAYAN MUTTULINGAM (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,304,239 total reported compensation
- JULIUS COURT (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $727,713 total reported compensation
- SEBASTIAN ANDERS TROENG (EVP CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP): $610,069 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Conservation International protects nature for people.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule ofield programs: - global field leadership team: the global field team aligns and manages field teams across the americas, africa, and asia-pacific regions, as well as global oceans, to set strategic priorities and mobilize and allocate resources to maximize efficiency and effectiveness in delivery.- americas field division: the americas field division comprises field offices in 9 countries throughout central america, south america and the carribean with investments through partners in another 22 countries. The americas division focuses on protecting and restoring forests, improving management of lands and oceans, and strengthening the protection of critical landscapes and seascapes in close partnership with local communities. Focal programs span sites in the amazon basin, tropical andes, atlantic forest, brazilian coast, carribean and eastern tropical pacific.- africa field division: the africa field division has field offices in 6 countries (angola, botswana, liberia, madagascar, kenya and south africa), with investments through partners in 39 of the 54 african countries. Across the african contient, ci works to strengthen the conservation and sustainable management of natural resources to improve livelihoods and reduce biological variety loss. Work includes balancing the protection of natural ecosystems with production priorities to build resilient communities where jobs and economic development are sustained by nature.- asia-pacific field division: the asia-pacific field division comprises of offices in 14 countries and investments through partners in 24 countries. The asia-pacific division aims to protect, restore, fund and scale conservation and support livelihoods by combining fieldwork with innovations in science, policy and finance. The asia-pacific portfolio comprises large-scale and sustainable conservation models in communities across the region. - center for oceans: the center for oceans conserves marine biological variety and ecosystems to secure ecological, social and economic benefits for people and nature. The team applies science-based approaches to: (1) improve fisheries and aquaculture systems to improve management in 20 critical fisheries and aquaculture areas, (2) catalyze the conservation of 18 million square kilometers of ocean (or 5% of the global ocean surface), (3) grow financing ten-fold to increase global mangrove cover by 20% by 2030 and (4) innovate place-based actions and policy, finance, and market-based solutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.4%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Pass
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.5%; rating input score 99; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.22; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 29 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 92.4% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 32 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $276.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 47 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 81 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 81 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.