Conscious Planet Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844134074
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Franklin, TN, USA
Phone
3107109092
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,991
Expenses
$31,822
Assets
$187,883

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAORUKO YAMAZAKI (President)

People named in this filing

  • NATHALIE THOME (Director)
  • JAGADISH VASUDEV (Director)
  • VINOD SITARAMAN (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific objective and purpose of this Corporation shall be to orient human activity towards a solution to the ecological crisis facing humanity by making people function consciously. It aims to raise human consciousness, to convey an understanding of who we are and our relation to the planet in an experiential way, to increase awareness of ecological issues among the larger population and move communities and governments towards more responsible action.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Conscious Planet initiative seeks to address this ecological degeneration of the Soil. Recognizing our responsibility to our children and future generations, it is critical to leave behind a planet capable of producing nutritious food, and align human activity to be supportive of nature and all life on our planet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.7%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 70.6%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.5%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.9; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.7% of revenue deployed · 70.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.