Virginia Health Information
Legal name: Connectvirginia Hie Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464611149
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Richmond, VA, US
- Phone
- 8049551790
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,091,851
- Expenses
- $927,941
- Assets
- $1,708,166
- Liabilities
- $614,173
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM HAZEL JR MD (CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)
- CHRISTOPHER BAILEY (VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)
- DEBBIE CONDREY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enable the secure sharing of near real-time health data to support care coordination, public health efforts and informed decision-making.
What it reported doing in 2017
The organization provides governance and the legal framework for secure data sharing throughout Virginia and provides a public health reporting pathway for patient related data. Contractual support is provided for participation in ehealth exchange as the mechanism for query and retrieval of patient summary care documents from the national health information exchange. Fees for these services are set at $59 per staffed bed per year for 2016 - 2018.the organization receives funding from vdh to support the development of the organization's statewide health information exchange. The exchange provides a single, statewide technology solution that connects all hospital emergency departments to facilitate real-time communication.the organization provides annual support and maintenance for all hospitals that register for the core services. Revenue from encounter alert services was $93,344 in 2017.the organization began collecting newborn screening data during 2017. The organization and the department of general services, division of consolidated laboratory services (dcls) are working to expand their capabilities to include the secure exchange of newborn screening data. These new capabilities support the electronic, secure and standards based exchange of nbs lab orders and results using nationally adopted health vocabularies. Revenue from newborn screening was $30,250 in 2017 which includes $24,000 for implementation of the required platform and $1,250 per month of recurring fees beginning august 2017.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 61.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $875K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $793K reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.