Connecticut Rise Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814104274
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New Haven, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2035350320
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,905,866
- Expenses
- $6,822,198
- Assets
- $5,914,498
- Liabilities
- $950,103
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY PALLIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- EMILY PALLIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $278,340 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER LEWINE CHIEF OF (DATA STRATEGY AND PRODUCT INNOVATION): $223,209 total reported compensation
- NICHELLE WOODSON (CHIEF OF NETWORK SUCCESS): $205,561 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Connecticut rise network's mission is to ensure all students graduate with a plan and the skills and confidence to achieve college and career success. Rise leads networks of school communities that work together to use data to learn and improve.
What it reported doing in 2024
The rise network has supported tens of thousands of students in achieving high school success and pursuing their college and career goals. Rise facilitates improvement networks, bringing together teachers, counselors, and administrators from diverse communities to solve shared challenges through disciplined improvement processes. Rise partners work together to pinpoint needs, pursue new innovations, and scale promising practices. Rise helps schools by investing in improvement infrastructure in three key areas. First, rise seek to empower educators through high-quality data systems and supporting tools. Second, rise builds educator capacity through networked improvement and sharing promising practices across schools and districts. Continued on schedule o.third, rise invests in more effective and efficient school structures and practices with a central focus on data teams and evidence-based practices that can support students during key transitions to, through, and beyond high school. Through rise's founding and most comprehensive network, rise partners with nine Connecticut high schools across eight districts, serving approximately 13,000 students. These schools simultaneously pursue on-track and postsecondary goals, and have engaged in this work with rise over the past eight years. Core network schools now serve as demonstration sites as rise works to scale its model in new communities, and innovation labs as rise continues to refine its strategies and data tools. In response to demand from the field, rise has also initiated consulting partnerships in 2020 to scale its approach in new partner schools. During the 2024-25 school year, rise partnered 55 total schools, spanning 32 districts and six states, and reaching over 35,000 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.3%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.3% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $278K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.