Connecticut Community Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061024632
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bristol, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8605896226
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,917,262
- Expenses
- $25,646,524
- Assets
- $17,971,324
- Liabilities
- $3,808,342
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIA EVANS STARR (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHRYN FREDA (FOUNDER SAGE SOLUTIONS): $253,984 total reported compensation
- JULIA EVANS STARR (PRESIDENT/CEO): $206,364 total reported compensation
- KEVIN DIONNE (DIRECTOR, INFORMATION SERVICES): $172,727 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. People served experience multiple chronic conditions and require direct in-home services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ct home care program - medicaid waiver funded: through a contract with the state of Connecticut department of social services (dss), Connecticut community care (ccc) provides the long term care management of health and social services for Connecticut's frail elderly to help keep them out of nursing homes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.8% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $254K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $963K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.