Connecticut Center for Patient Safety

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201517678
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Fairfield, CT, USA
Phone
2036100610
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,274
Expenses
$48,143
Assets
$69,220
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alan Manning (President)
  • Jim Kinsey (Vice President Treasurer)
  • Lisa Freeman (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Alan Manning (President)
  • Jim Kinsey (Vice President Treasurer)
  • Donna Drouin (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Connecticut Center for Patient Safety works to promote patient safety, improve the quality of health care and protect the rights of patients. Quality health care is a right.

What it reported doing in 2022

Public Education- raise public awareness and provide factual information to the public and members. Educate consumers/patients on patient engagement and what they need to know and do as informed consumers. During the year, we hold educational sessions, build relationships with legislative, advocacy and business organizations. Maintain our websites. Work to form partnerships to improve patient outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.1%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 104.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.