Connecticut Association of Athletic Directors Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061143881
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cheshire, CT, USA
Phone
2032501111
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$148,871
Expenses
$147,198
Assets
$7,773

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK BERKOWITZ (PRESIDENT EL)
  • VJ SARULLO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAMIAN FRASSINELLI (PAST PRESIDE)
  • DAVE DENNEHY (PAST PRESIDE)
  • KEN MARCUCIO CCA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Maintain and promote high school programs in schools that are members of the Connecticut association of schools that will encourage the widest possibel student anthletic participation with the highest possible standards.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promotion of the importance of high school athletics; improvement of relationships between atheletes and athletic programs throughout Connecticut schools; presentation of opportunities for exchange of ideas of mutual problems and practices; creation of better unity and communications among all member schools; foster high standards of professional proficiency and ethics; act as a liaison for the dissemination of pertinent information on national and state issues and practices specific to the administration of high school athletic departments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 57.6%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57% of revenue deployed · 57.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.