Congregations for the Homeless

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453932748
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bellevue, WA, USA
Phone
4252894044
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,835,883
Expenses
$7,473,381
Assets
$28,476,729
Liabilities
$16,575,612

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • TROY CHRISTENSEN (EXECUTIVE DI): $202,387 total reported compensation
  • SHIRLEY TOLSTYKH (DIR OF FINAN): $153,077 total reported compensation
  • KERRI O'FARRELL (DIR OF DEVEL): $134,968 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing shelter, housing, food, and case management services to men experiencing homelessness on the east side of king county, wa.

What it reported doing in 2024

Shelter: porchlight's 24/7 emergency men's shelter offers a safe, welcoming environment every day of the year for men experiencing homelessness. As the only dedicated shelter for men in east king county, the ems provides critical services and resources to help individuals rebuild their lives and secure stable income and housing. Each day, the ems serves over 100 men, up to 125 during severe weather, and more than 340 men throughout the year. Men served by porchlight face deeply intersecting barriers: a severe lack of affordable housing, rising rents, limited access to timely mental health and addiction treatment, and systemic racial and economic disparities. Many of these men work full-time jobs, yet still cannot afford housing in our community. Without a safe, supportive place to rest and access resources, the daily struggle for stability can feel insurmountable. At porchlight, we believe that shelter is more than a bed. It's an opportunity to restore dignity and provide needed tools to build a more stable future. Porchlight hotel program was an extension of the ems; its goal was to provide a healthier environment for the most medically fragile men who seek shelter with us. It came online during the covid-19 pandemic and continued until the end of 2024. Porchlight rented rooms within an eastgate area hotel, which served up to 20 men at a time. Men staying with us also must follow specific behavioral requirements that kept the hotel owner satisfied with our program. Clients in the hotel were provided meals and had access to all of our supportive services, including housing navigation and case management. Porchlight's rotating shelter (rs) is a unique, recovery-informed overnight shelter that serves up to 25 adult men each night who are experiencing homelessness in east king county. As a safe, respectful environment, rs is a medium barrier behavior-based program and shelters clients who are housing focused. It is our foundational program as it is the original program at porchlight when we started in 1993 (then called congregations for the homeless). Operating from 6:00 p.m. To 7:30 a.m., the rs offers more than a safe place to sleep-it provides a supportive, sober community where men can access case management, mental health and addiction services, and the stability needed to work toward permanent housing. As the only recovery-focused shelter of its kind in the region, the rs provides a trusted, clean, and sober environment where guests are treated with dignity and supported through both progress and setbacks. Porchlight's outreach program plays a crucial role in engaging with men experiencing homelessness throughout east king county. For many of our shelter guests, outreach is the first point of contact and the introduction to porchlight. In partnership with city staff, police, emergency services, and other community stakeholders, our outreach coordinator proactively visits public spaces - parks, libraries, greenbelts, bus stops, and more-to meet men where they are, build trust, and share information about available resources. Additionally, our outreach coordinator is the face of our i & r services (information and referral) - bridging the gap between people in need and the resources available to them in east king county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.81; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.