Congenital Hyperinsulinism International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203068945
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Glen Ridge, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9735660334
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,275,774
- Expenses
- $1,126,855
- Assets
- $2,173,955
- Liabilities
- $320,502
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE RASKIN (CEO)
- LAURA SULLIVAN (President)
- JULIE SHELDON (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE RASKIN (CEO): $114,071 total reported compensation
- TAI PASQUINI (CRO): $95,000 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER SCHMITT (COO): $90,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Congenital Hyperinsulinism International (CHI) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to improving the lives of babies, children, and adults affected by congenital hyperinsulinism (HI). HI is a life-threatening genetic disorder that causes severe low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) in infants and children, though in 50% of patients, the genetic cause is unknown. For those with HI, the beta cells of the pancreas secrete too much insulin in an unregulated manner. Excess insulin causes hypoglycemia. Prolonged or severe hypoglycemia can cause seizures, permanent brain damage, or even death if left untreated. A good prognosis is far more likely with a timely diagnosis and proper management.
What it reported doing in 2024
CHI supports research and development to better understand, treat, manage, and hopefully cure HI. CHI shares the patient perspective with researchers and members of the biopharmaceutical industry to accelerate the development of patient-centered treatments. CHI is a part of the Million Dollar Bike Ride grant program with the University of Pennsylvanias Center for Orphan Diseases; a pilot research grant is offered each year for an innovative, preclinical or clinical study with the potential to lead to a better HI treatment, a cure for HI, or improvement in the quality of life for those affected by HI. In 2024, CHI was able to award two pilot research grants through this program.In 2024, the CHI Research Staff worked with a lead epidemiologist to publish The Birth Prevalence of Congenital Hyperinsulinism: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology of a Rare Disease. This publication, published in Hormone Research in Pediatrics, reviews epidemiological data on HI as reported in the literature, identifying the strengths and limitations of each HI prevalence study.CHI conducts the HI Global Registry (HIGR) research project. HIGR provides a convenient online platform for the HI patient community to share their experiences of living with HI. With permission from the patient families, MaxHIGR provides complementary data from the physician perspective. By participating in the HI Global Registry, the patient community helps themselves and researchers better understand HI to advance better treatments, a potential cure, and more timely and accurate diagnoses. A HIGR report is published each year by the CHI staff. Scholars and research may request deidentified data for their research projects. In 2024, CHI continued to lead the Collaborative Research Network (CRN), a project of CHI dedicated to the development of faster and more accurate diagnoses, new evidence-based treatments and cures, standardized clinical guidelines, and increased and improved access to treatment, medication, devices, and supplies. This ambitious project includes working groups focused on different aspects of a prioritized research agenda (PRA) developed by the CRNs members including 60 leading researchers, clinicians, and patient advocates from 17 countries The CRN members have been focused on the top priorities identified in the PRA: Newborn Screening (Diagnose all babies with congenital hyperinsulinism in a timely manner); Glucose as a Vital Sign (Increase awareness and timely diagnosis of HI); Care Guidelines (Create and disseminate continually evolving global care guidelines); Natural History (Build a robust registry that collects patient-reported, physician, and real-world data to provide a foundation for HI natural history); Continuous Glucose Monitoring (Create principles for Draft guidelines on CGM use in HI patients). Since the launch of the CRN in 2020, the CRN members have published a total of 194 articles on congenital hyperinsulinism covering a wide range of topics including genetics, treatment, disease management, monitoring and technology, screening and diagnostics, clinical guidelines, education, patient experience, quality of life, policy, and access to care. In 2024, the CRN published an Advocacy Statement and List of Essential Medical Care, Medication, Supplies, and Services for people with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI). The CRN also published "Continuous glucose monitoring for children and young people with hyperinsulinism: a practical guide for families & professionals and CGM: a tool to support HI families". These guides are a collaboration of work by HI experts around the world, including many who are part of the CHI CRN and CHI staff. Patient and caregiver representatives of the CHI CRN provided the patient perspective. CHI continues to support the Open Hyperinsulinism Genes Program in partnership with the University of Exeter in the UK. This program is the first point-of-need international genetic testing service for HI and is also accelerating
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.5%; rating input score 93; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.93; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.1% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $992K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.