Concacaf
Legal name: Confederation of North Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf)
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133605859
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3057043232
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Soccer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,099,136
- Expenses
- $182,233,587
- Assets
- $154,970,439
- Liabilities
- $91,888,405
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VITTORIO EMILIO MONTAGLIANI (COUNCIL MEMBER/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- VITTORIO EMILIO MONTAGLIANI (COUNCIL MEMBER/PRESIDENT): $3,009,530 total reported compensation
- PHILIPPE MOGGIO (GENERAL SECRETARY): $2,432,907 total reported compensation
- ALEJANDRO LESENDE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $897,910 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To govern and develop football across North America, Central America, and the Caribbean, organizing competitions and supporting member associations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program services the confederation of north, central american and caribbean association football ("concacaf") is the governing body for soccer ("football") in the region, and one of six continental authorities that administers the game along with the federation internationale de football association ("fifa"), the world governing body. Concacaf has 41 member associations, including guyana, suriname and french guyana on the south american continent. Its primary administrative functions are to organize competitions for national teams and clubs, and to conduct world cup qualifying tournaments. As the administrative body for the region, concacaf organizes competitions, offers training courses in technical and administrative aspects of the game, and helps to build football throughout the region. Concacaf owns the broadcast rights to the various events and either directly or through agents, finds broadcast partners and sponsors for the events, thus building the audience for soccer in furtherance of its exempt purposes. Concacaf carries out its mission by effectuating or facilitating international and local competitions, conducting meetings and congresses, providing courses and other educational programs, promoting friendly relationships among the member organizations, and generally insuring that there is no political, religious or racial discrimination within or among the associations. Three regional "unions" support concacaf in these efforts: the caribbean football union ("cfu") (which includes guyana, suriname, and french guyana), the unin centroamericana de ftbol ("uncaf"), and the north american football union ("nafu"). These three entities organize regional and qualification events to various concacaf competitions. Presently, concacaf conducts or facilitates the following competitions, among others: - the champions league (an annual invitational tournament for club teams from north america, central america and the caribbean with a limited number of teams from any one country); - men's and women's olympic qualifying tournaments; - men's and women's u-20 and u-17 (biennial tournaments --men in one year, women in the next --for players under age twenty or under age seventeen); - a quadrennial futsal tournament; and - men's & women's world cup qualifiers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $3M · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4M reported
- Consistency: 15 of 18 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 32 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ForeignGrants column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.