Conexa Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464697208
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
6192049513
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$149,239
Expenses
$89,065
Assets
$82,007

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark Maxwell (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Maxwell (President & CEO)
  • Dan Kim (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to develop localized healing resources in mental and relational health in every community, with an emphasis on increasing resources in communities of need.

What it reported doing in 2024

Project Pamoja Kenya: For two weeks in the summer of 2024, Conexa collaborated with the Systemic Family Therapy Association of Kenya and Peace Together to do Project Pamoja Kenya (Pamoja meaning "together"). Modeled after the success of the previous year in Uganda, Conexa raised the generous support of so many to not only host another EFT Externship, but engage even more with the communities of Nairobi, Kenya, in advancing systemic approaches to mental health in communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.