Conestoga Valley Youth Soccer Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232812265
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lancaster, PA, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sports Associations &Training Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,806
Expenses
$77,189
Assets
$73,196
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mike Keim (President)
  • Jason Dagen (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mike Keim (President)
  • Jason Dagen (Vice President)
  • Tori Byers (Registrar)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Conestoga Valley Youth Soccer Club Form 990EZ Part 1 Line 16 Other Expenses Description Amount Youth Soccer Club Club Activities 29341 Programming expenses 28519 State Association Fees 9087 Support Expenses 10241 TOTAL 77189 Form 990EZ Part III Primary Exempt Purpose To provide opportunities for children of various ages to gain basic understanding of the skill sets required to enjoy the sport of soccer Form 990EZ Part III Line 28 First Accomplishment Youth soccer club provides opportunities for children of various ages to gain a basic understanding of the skill set required to enjoy the sport of soccer As skills progress the athletes are provided with the opportunity to compete with each other and with other teams in the local community Part 120 Updated amount to reflect the numeric change in fund balance

What it reported doing in 2024

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.