Conejos County Hospital Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320379184
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2011
Location
La Jara, CO, USA
Phone
7192745121
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$153,995
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAN GAY (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAN GAY (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • CHERI CROWDER DIRECTORVICE-CHAIR (& SECRETARY/TREASURER)
  • Kathy Lorenz (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation's main mission is to enhance the quality and availability of healthcare services in conejos county by generating and administering charitable gifts to conejos county hospital (cch). The foundation aspires to be a significant contributor to assist cch to maintain its role as the primary healthcare facility in conejos county. The foundation will encourage philanthropic giving through public education and events, and currently plans to hold three to four major fundraisers per year within conejos county and throughout the san luis valley.

What it reported doing in 2017

SUPPORT OF CONEJOS COUNTY HOSPITAL corporation (part of the san luis valley regional medical center system)

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.