Concrete Safaris Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204976317
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6468691503
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $797,247
- Expenses
- $727,100
- Assets
- $389,677
- Liabilities
- $48,011
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHARON LEVINE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SHARON LEVINE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $133,192 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Concrete safaris' mission is to prepare youth in east harlem and beyond to lead healthy lives and shape their environment through outdoor education, play, exploration, and community engagement.
What it reported doing in 2024
Public health americorps members served children, youth and community with environmental health literacy and placemaking workshops or outreach and referral services at concrete safaris' placemakingcorps. Outdoor leadership academy - youth offers environmental health-centered internships for youth. It aims to expose 14-24 year olds to healthcare, business, media, food services, and construction opportunities, develop their leadership skills, and engage the local community in outdoor activities. Interns participate in project-based learning or work for 6 to 25 hours per week in gardening, outdoor play, placemaking, health promotion, photography, evaluation, or nonprofit management. The 2024 program involved 306 interns, paid by the nyc department of youth and community development or the nyc human resource administration. Outdoor leadership academy - kids is an after-school program and summer camp operating 5 days/week that aims to improve the health and fitness of elementary school children. In 2024, children in the second to fifth grades learned basic outdoor skills and/or developed active living interventions, gardened, took photographs, cycled, and embarked on field trips. Gardening activities took place on land belonging to the New York city housing authority. All other outdoor, active programming took place in nyc parks and streets. Youth delivered junglegym 2024 on east 106th and east 116th streets, both between lexington and third avenues, for children, families, groups, & neighbors to experience single-day, outdoor adventures in the streets, including obstacles, games, arts & crafts, dancing, & more. Face painting and bouncy houses were also enjoyed. Green exercise days, cs' garden-based field trip program, was provided to over 200 children from local schools. Local residents also continued to participate in an adopt-a-bed program and daily volunteer opportunities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $44.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $665K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.