Concrete Rose
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934203128
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039395094
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Employment N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,359
- Expenses
- $36,377
- Assets
- $83,244
- Liabilities
- $6,262
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELA SMITH (President)
People named in this filing
- ANGELA SMITH (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Concrete Rose Foundation is a nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is to provide transformative support services to individuals impacted by incarceration, trauma, and systemic barriers. Through structured programming rooted in accountability and personal development, the organization helps participants rebuild their lives by addressing legal, emotional, educational, and workforce-related needs. Concrete Rose equips individuals and families with tools to transition from survival to stability through leadership development, trauma-informed reentry services, and community-based healing initiatives. The foundation operates with a blueprint model that mirrors constructiondemolition of harmful patterns, framing of new identity, rewiring mindset and choices, and finish work to sustain long-term transformation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Held three Equine Therapy sessions and hosted two Legal Law Clinics in partnership with MPD Law, drawing over 350 attendees. Organized the Challenge to Change event series.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.8%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 55.6%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.8% of revenue deployed · 55.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.