Concordia Lutheran Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270209886
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cabot, PA, USA
Phone
724-352-1571
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,814,787
Expenses
$59,608,288
Assets
$114,633,695
Liabilities
$54,490,444

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Keith Frndak-See Schedule O (Chair/President)
  • Kay Frndak-Suder (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Keith Frndak-See Schedule O (Chair/President): $905,273 total reported compensation
  • Brian Hortert-See Schedule O (Board Member): $551,892 total reported compensation
  • Michael Falbo-See Schedule O (Secretary/Treasurer): $358,686 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Since 1881, Concordia Lutheran Ministries has been a place with a mission of caring—serving our aging community with a continuum of high-quality caregiving options in a Christian environment, and serving those with limited funds to the best of our ability. We will be wise stewards of all of our resources. We will strive to be excellent financial managers. We will manage with a "scarce dollar" mindset and we will not waste our resources. We will always look to the future, recognizing that investing in Concordia and our future is our top priority and that we have an obligation to plan to further our mission in order to serve future generations. Principle Seven: The Concordia Way We will strive to manage all of Concordia's affairs according to Biblical standards. Concordia means harmony, and to the best of our ability, we will strive to live and work with harmonious relationships. We...

What it reported doing in 2024

Concordia of the South Hills Independent Living is a one hundred and twenty-six unit apartment building located in the beautiful and highly regarded Mt. Lebanon neighborhood of the South Hills of Pittsburgh. With its luscious scenery and picturesque views, residents of our premier facility enjoy easy access to both healthcare and professional services, as well as an abundance of retirement amenities, all while enjoying the luxuries of retirement living. From our restaurant style, chef-inspired dining, to our engaging suite of exercise coaches, residents are able to choose from an abundance of social, educational, and fun activities each and every day. As a pillar of the South Hills, Concordia maintains a welcoming relationship with the entire public by way of social gatherings, holiday events and craft shows, and as a result offers engaging interactions between residents and the community. With a growing wait-list, Concordia is committed to ensuring that our establishment upholds the highest caliber of retirement living, all at an affordable price. As part of our mission, however, Concordia also understands the importance of giving back to the local community and strives to help others when given the opportunity. When Concordia purchased this community over a decade ago, none of the entrance fees were transferred to Concordia by the original owner. Instead, out of good faith, the Organization has honored the Life Care benefit of all of those legacy residents and continues to do so to this day.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 62
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $53.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $905K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.