Concord Elementary Pta 6 15 76
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911592453
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2062528100
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,508
- Expenses
- $51,887
- Assets
- $36,899
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Meredith Hall (President)
People named in this filing
- Meredith Hall (President)
- Nicole Lincoln (Secretary)
- Steven Mansfield (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Concord PTA mission: Our mission as parents, teachers, and community members is to work in partnership towards three goals: 1. Support of our students in learning academically and emotionally; 2. Support of our teachers and acknowledgement of the unique challenges they face, teaching in a high-poverty school; and 3. Support of our parents and caregivers, raising children to be active, caring and respectful citizens in a diverse and dynamic culture. We are motivated by our responsibilities and very much respect the public school system and it's important mission to educate all children in our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our PTA provided classroom snacks to every classroom, funded classroom and student work materials, was the fiscal sponsor for the school native club, sponsored school-wide events, and teacher recognition events. We continue to advocate for multilingual learning in our school and in the district.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -36.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 36% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.