Concilio De Salud Integral De Loíza Inc.

Legal name: Concilio De Salud Integral De Loiza Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237259899
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2022
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Loiza, PR, United States
Phone
787-876-2042
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,681,999
Expenses
$43,196,164
Assets
$89,328,769
Liabilities
$1,803,671

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cesar A Rodriguez Roman (Executive Director)
  • Maria L Rivera Escalera (President Board of Directors)
  • Ivette Perez Moralez (Vice President of Board of Directors)

Highest reported compensation

  • Cesar A Rodriguez Roman (Executive Director): $159,254 total reported compensation
  • Maria De Los A Rodriguez Vazquez (Medical Director): $147,307 total reported compensation
  • Juan Aponte (Medical Faculty): $120,238 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Somos una institución sin fines de lucro que ofrece servicios de salud primaria, educación y prevención de forma integral y emplea el modelo de cuidado dirigido para servir a las comunidades del noreste de Puerto Rico y en especial en las poblaciones más vulnerables de la región.

What it reported doing in 2022

Primary Care Physicians and State Manage Care Program

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.