Concierge Chaplain Ministry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270608440
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2011, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Sandpoint, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2082552619
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,276
- Expenses
- $625
- Assets
- $5,605
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to:1. Provide an opportunity for those who normally can't attend church to be able to attend church services.2. Provide continuity of religious services to the Sand Point resort community at chapel and ski area where there is no consistent schedule and at Swietzer chapel.3. Provide church services during the summer for Lake residents who can't get into town for services.4. Be available for all citizens for worship, baptisms, marriage, funerals, blessings, etc.5. Provide ministerial services including, but not limited to, those services which can be performed by a duly licensed and ordained Episcopal Priest.
What it reported doing in 2011
The organization provided religious services to the Sand Point community and provided ministerial services which can be performed by a duly licensed and ordained Episcopal Priest.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.97; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -129.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $600 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.