Concerns of Police Survivors Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521354370
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Camdenton, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5733464911
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Law Enforcement
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,352,697
- Expenses
- $7,274,447
- Assets
- $17,606,936
- Liabilities
- $3,852,072
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CONNIE MOYER (PAST PRESIDENT)
- DAVE WALLACE (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Dianne Bernhard (Executive Dir.): $186,491 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides resources to assist in the rebuilding of the lives of surviving families and co-workers affected by law enforcement officers killed in the line-of-duty as determined by federal criteria. Provides training to law enforcement agencies on survivor victimization issues and educates the public of the need to support the law enforcement profession and its survivors.
What it reported doing in 2025
PROGRAMS: Grief Seminars are held throughout the year for all law enforcement survivors across the United States. In May of each year during the National Police Survivors' Conference held in Washington, DC, during National Police Week, survivors can attend a number of different seminars on grief issues. Approximately 4,959 police survivors and affected coworkers registered for C.O.P.S. seminars. Debriefings, one-on-one counseling, family counseling and crisis intervention sessions were held for the adult survivors. The children participate in their own peer-support group sessions and work with counselors and trauma specialists to address their individual grief issues. C.O.P.S. provides survivor specific weekends/camps, known as "Hands-On Programs". They are C.O.P.S. Kids Camp, Outward Bound Adventure, Young Adults Camp, Adult Children, Spouses, Spouses for Couples, Parents, Sibling, Co-workers, Co-workers for Couples, Fianc/Significant Other, Extended Family Retreats, Summer Suicide Survivors Retreat and Fall Suicide Survivors Retreat. These weekends/camps are held at rural locations around the country. The survivors experience self-help challenge activities as well as meeting and networking with peers who have experienced the same type of loss. All of the weekends/camps have licensed mental health professionals that provide group and individual grief counseling for the survivors. The weekends/camps held during 2025-26 had 1,890 survivors in attendance. Survivors return time and time again to C.O.P.S.' programs for support. The first time they attend, they say it is because the event honors their fallen officer. The second time they attend a C.O.P.S. event, they do it for their own mental well-being. After that, they come to provide support to the more newly-bereaved families. However, survivors have also returned years later when they realize issues with the death have never been emotionally resolved, the perpetrator may be coming up for parole or another life experience has brought the horror of the death back to the forefront of their thoughts.Public Safety Agency Assistance is accomplished in a number of different ways. Each year C.O.P.S. holds a series of training sessions titled The Traumas of Law Enforcement. These trainings educate America's law enforcement agencies on appropriate responses to officer death and appropriate care for law enforcement families affected by line-of-duty death, disability, post-traumatic stress disorder and police suicide. In the 2025-26 fiscal year, these 3-day trainings were held in St. Louis, MO; Chandler, AZ; Billings, MT; Baltimore, MD; Dearborn, MI; Golden, CO; North Dartmouth, MA; Miami, FL; and Biloxi, MS. C.O.P.S. contracts with leaders in the field of police trauma to conduct the sessions. The resource manual, PowerPoint presentations and entire training have been highly praised by training participants year after year. In the 30 years that C.O.P.S. has been sponsoring these trainings, 230 sessions have been held.C.O.P.S. held its 11th annual National Conference on Law Enforcement Wellness & Trauma. This Conference had sessions with topics on suicide awareness and prevention, tactical self-care for first responders, creating a peer support program for officers, LAWS-Leadership, Accountability, Wellness, and Service, mental health awareness, navigating family life in law enforcement. This conference on Wellness and Trauma was well received with a total of 745 participants from across the country.C.O.P.S. held its 2nd annual Surviving to Thriving Conference. The conference had sessions with topics on navigating grief, self-care, conflict management and building strong relationships. This conference had 82 participants from across the country. C.O.P.S. also produces a monthly Rap Sheet newsletter for law enforcement. This newsletter is emailed to over 38,000 law enforcement officers and agencies across the United States. C.O.P.S. provides printed educational materials to law enforcemen
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.6%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.6% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $186K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 40 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.