Concerned Businesses Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820471641
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Coeur Dalene, ID, USA
Phone
2087553829
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,625
Expenses
$16,572
Assets
$18,194

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Facilitate cooperation between public and private sector to enhance the quality of life in kootenai county for all citizens.

What it reported doing in 2011

Concerned businesses is a group of executives actively engaging with community and government leaders to make the best overall decisions for kootenai county. Decisions of land use, schools, infrastructure, staff motivation, and fiscal stewardship benefit from diverse management and problem-solving experiences commonly found in business. The executive director is responsible for researching background data related to such decisions, coordinating relevant input from a variety of sources and communicating that input to the community and government leaders. Cooperation between the public and private sectors mobilizes resources for creatively resolving complex growth challenges, thereby enhancing quality of life for all county citizens.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.7%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -42.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -62.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.