Compassion Relief Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472137105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9739821001
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,137
- Expenses
- $7,286
- Assets
- $12,281
- Liabilities
- $124
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FETHULLAH GULOGLU (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- FETHULLAH GULOGLU (PRESIDENT)
- SULEYMAN NUMAN OZ (SECRETARY)
- HISLATJON Y SADIZODA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build a more comfortable, serene, and peaceful world while fighting poverty and attempting to eliminate social inequalities to encourage our society to be more understanding and engaging with the notion of humanitarian aid to support innocent people in war-torn areas to accept and help people from all races, ages, religions, and social statuses in order to spread kindness around the world and to create and follow social support models to oppose inequalities due to illness, unemployment, psychological and physical disadvantages with all modern instruments and most effective methods while creating a communal awareness of such issues through campaigns to aid in earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes and other natural disasters as quickly and effectively as possible to offer health services to those who require them but cannot afford them to provide education for children and youth who do not have access to proper schooling for economic or other reasons to host and encourage social gath
What it reported doing in 2017
Raise funds for another not frofit foundation with similar nfp mission
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -240.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.