Compassion Physical Therapy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463250730
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, US
Phone
9099481124
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,790
Expenses
$63,129
Assets
$119,750
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY BEKENDAM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NATALIE WINBLAD (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GINA BEKENDAM (TREASURER)
  • JAN HIGA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is our mission to join God where He is already at work through partnering with organizations to establish clinics, provide training, equipment and the salaries of local therapists.

What it reported doing in 2018

To provide physical therapy services in impoverished areas to people who are underprivileged and underserved while sharing the love of christ and living out the gospel made possible by the donations of others who believe we are called to "serve the least of these".

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.6%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 76.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 57.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.