Compassion Care for Disabled Children Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522062902
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Bowie, MD, USA
Phone
2409294281
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,887
Expenses
$53,838
Assets
$31,074
Liabilities
$145

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dr Mary Campbell (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jack Walsh (CEOExec Dir): $12,210 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Humanitarian organization with a global mission of bringing medical treatment, mobility devices, and physical therapy programs to disabled children in need.

What it reported doing in 2025

CareCoach, Inc. of Duluth, GA, a company that provides medical services to rural homebound elderly patients, made a wonderful GIK donation to us of 200 brand new and gently used stand-alone blood pressure monitoring units. We worked with Christian Connections for International Health to identify fellow member nonprofits with medical missions that could use these units. The MAMA Project, in Pennsburg, PA was building Well Mother and Baby Kits, and the one component that they were lacking (and about to buy at significant expense), was BP units Using a combination of CareCoach managers and DCF volunteers (including 2 board members), we were able to inspect 115 units, pack them, and ship them to Pennsburg via overnight air, so that the units could be included in the kits, and be loaded onto a cargo ship that had donated cargo space. 85 units went to MAMA Projects clinics in South Sudan. The rest went to their smaller operations in Kenya and India, with the rem being sent separately to Haiti. All of these countries have faced massive natural disasters, and violence, up to and including civil war. In all these places, birth complications are way too common, as are maternal and infant deaths. Children who do survive, sometimes develop physical or cognitive disabilities from a birth trauma. We are so joyful to be able to partner with these great Pennsylvanians in saving lives. We also sent 45 of these units to Mission to Ukraine (MTU). We have had strong working relationship with them since the unprovoked Russian invasion of their country in 2022. They are located in Zhitomir, in Western Ukraine, in between Kyiv and the Polish border. They provide a full range of medical, and physical occupational therapy services to over 600 disabled children. We sent them 45 BP monitoring units, also using expedited shipping so the units could be shipped within a few days via cargo ship. , We also collected and shipped over 100 pairs of winter mittens and gloves to MTU, contributed by wonderful donors from Maryland and Indiana.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -31.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.