Compass 360 Missions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853575993
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ashburn, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7033070974
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,219
- Expenses
- $38,667
- Assets
- $5,848
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN STEWARDSON (EXECUTIVE DI)
- MARCELLA MACAULEY (DIRECTOR)
- AMY STEWARDSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Compass 360 missions is a christian ministry that focuses on engaging, equipping and empowering local zambian communities, with the intention of breaking the generational cycle of poverty. Our goal is to collaborate with each community, assessing needs, identifying resources, increasing investments and attaining sustainability. Education, trades, skills and leadership development program guided by gospel and the holy spirit will help transform the hearts, minds and futures.
What it reported doing in 2024
In the chisunka chiefdom in zambia we organize "camp pathways" - a full day, four day camp where we cover the cost of food, teacher and camp leader salaries as well as the cost of materials. We support the operation of a farm and a hammermill and built two dwellings for the farm labor to provide job training, infrastructure development and career networking. We provide transportation in the form of a truck and supply the maintenance and gas for its operation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -76.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.