CommunityHealth IT

Legal name: Communityhealth It Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451031343
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kennedy Space Center, FL, USA
Phone
9043185803
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Job Training

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,827,335
Expenses
$1,722,868
Assets
$1,334,337
Liabilities
$683,096

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENDRA SILER PHD (CEO AND PRESIDENT)
  • DAVIS WILLIS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KENDRA SILER PHD (CEO AND PRESIDENT): $199,098 total reported compensation
  • KEVIN SALZER (TREASURER/CTO): $115,138 total reported compensation
  • ANDY POST (VP OF OPERATIONS): $78,720 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve community health, patient safety, and quality care through the support of quality community engaged research.

What it reported doing in 2024

Commhit created and administered a health- and tech-related network as part of its community connected care workforce (c3w+) program. The network addresses the needs of rural safety net facilities as well as ems agencies and are primarily comprised of rural and critical access hospital and ems agencies to develop cp training and programs, bolster digital security of participating organizations, and train chws. The overarching goal of the network is to create a strong, flexible tech and health infrastructure trained and prepared for day-to-day and emergency needs of rural communities. One of the main approaches that commhit uses is to develop mobile integrated health (mih) programs anchored by fire rescue departments. In Florida, the number of mobile integrative health programs went from 2 to 90, due to commhit's network, influence, and the support of federal grants. Commhit defines mih as a coordinated model of care in which fire rescue, clinicians, and community partners deliver proactive, in place healthcare and follow up services outside the hospital, supported by shared data, standardized workflows, and statewide integration. It is designed to reduce avoidable emergencies, strengthen continuity of care, and improve outcomes for high need populations and in resource-limited settings.as of june 2025, 158 commhit training participants engaged in training and credentialing for community health worker (chw), community paramedic, and cybersecurity. Of those 158 participants, 108 received training as chws, four were trained in community paramedic, 36 were trained in cybersecurity for healthcare professionals, and ten received the hipaa for msps training.as of november 2024, commhit registered an apprenticeship through the Florida department of education (fdoe) that trains people with no experience to become firefighter-emergency medical technicians, paramedics, community health workers, and culminates in community paramedics. This apprenticeship career lattice was built with the support of the Florida fire chiefs association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 90% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $147.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 119.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $337K reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.