Community Wellness Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850431072
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Belen, NM, USA
- Phone
- 2144250129
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,393
- Expenses
- $112,686
- Assets
- $187,612
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ginny Adame (Board President)
- Celestino Landavazo (Board Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Margaret Gutjahr (Treasurer)
- Ginny Adame (Board President)
- Celestino Landavazo (Board Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Promote community collaboration through a framework of coordination, assessment and solutions. Community Collation
What it reported doing in 2024
These funds were awarded bt the State to the Community Wellness Council (Health Council for Valencia County. These funds are awarded thru the Department of Health DOH and are fiscally monitored and overseen by DOH in support of the CWC, the state-recognized public health council for Valencia County. The Health Council is key in conducting assessments and program coordination serving Valencia County for over 26 years. These funds governed by DOH require the CWC to meet all deliverables provided by DOH. In addition to meetng all stated deliverables, the CWC efforts include (1) expansion of outreach to the community (2) Identify and address systems-level health disparities, (3) Gather and evaluate data, and (4) support residents in accessing servcices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 52.1%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 52.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.