Community Volunteer Connection

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861778597
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Okanogan, WA, USA
Phone
5094293133
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$35
Assets
$43
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kathy Power (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Kathy Power (Executive Director)
  • Holly Kelley (Chairwoman of the Board)
  • Susan Edwards (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Community Volunteer Connection Is a Public Benefit WA State Non-Profit Charity Organization with 501 (c) (3) status. We recruit and coordinate local volunteers on projects to assist community members in underserved Okanogan County in WA State experiencing distress in their lives. We provide volunteer assistance in projects for vetted distressed and underprivileged individuals experiencing personal crisis while nurturing their need for independence. We also recruit and coordinate local and regional volunteers for assistance in resistance, response, relief and recovery projects from local disasters. The citizens of Okanogan County have experienced 14 devastating wildfires and 3 significant flood events in the last 8 years. Recovery projects are ongoing for the 2020 and 2021 wildfire disasters.

What it reported doing in 2025

Program service accomplishments are currently writing grants for startup funding.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -90.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -62.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.