Community Vision

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592896657
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Kissimmee, FL, USA
Phone
4078473174
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Reported finances

Revenue
$280,642
Expenses
$405,565
Assets
$94,533
Liabilities
$89,739

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KATRINA SCARBOUROUGH (CHAIR PERSON)
  • Jennifer Bondy (PAST CHAIR)
  • Brent Burish (PAST CHAIR PERSON)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bring people and resources together to achieve the community's vision

What it reported doing in 2020

COMMUNITY VISION LEADS LOCAL EFFORTS IN ADDRESSING SELF-SUFFICIENCY FOR OSCEOLA'S MOST VULNERABLE RESIDENTS. OUR EMPOWERMENT 2 EMPLOYMENT PUTS LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED BACK ON TRACK FOR RE-EMPLOYMENT. PROJECT OPEN OFFERS EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS/PRECARIOUSLY HOUSED PARENTS AND INDIVIDUALS. Community Vision takes the pulse of the community by conducting surveys at community outreach events garnering citizen input on issues and concerns.In addition, we partner with local government and business on community betterment projects including Discover Osceola connecting residents to programs, services and amenities and playground builds improving neighborhoods.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4,063.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -44.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $345K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.