Community Technical Assistance Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 251416852
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2015–2015
Forms available: Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone: 4122312822
Rating: 79
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue: $146,363
Expenses: $115,504
Assets: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

STEPHANIE MILLER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

STEPHANIE MILLER (PRESIDENT)
ASHLEIGH DEEMER (VICE PRESIDE)
MATT DIERSEN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The community technical assistance center inc. (ctac) is a non-profit corporation whose objective is to maximize productivity and accountability for the many varied resources committed to community development in the pittsburgh region. Ctac strengthens the structure of community organizations and the skills of community leaders through education, professional guidance, financial systems, technical support, an extensive consultant network, and information consultant network and an information center for community development resources.

What it reported doing in 2015

Technical assistance - to maximize production and accountability for the many varied resources committed to community development in the pittsburgh region.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 74
Transparency & Controls: 100
Sustainability: 46
Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 67.1%; rating input score 67
Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

Operating margin: 21.1%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -33% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 67.1% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
Schedules: 4 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.