Community Support Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812584189
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- New Brighton, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6513878050
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services for Adolescent Parents
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,320
- Expenses
- $96,980
- Assets
- $290,851
- Liabilities
- $1,537
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNN ISAACSON (BOARD DIRECTOR AND PRESIDENT)
- SARAH WHITWORTH (BOARD DIRECTOR AND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KAREN MEYER (KEY EMPLOYEE)
- LYNN ISAACSON (BOARD DIRECTOR AND PRESIDENT)
- SARAH WHITWORTH (BOARD DIRECTOR AND VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rents, Utilities paid to landlords and utilities, and other payments necessary for Neighbors (Clients) to remain employed and maintain their apartments/or houses
What it reported doing in 2025
Rents and Utilities paid to landlords and utilities to sustain housing for Neighbors
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.4%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 16
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.4% of revenue deployed · 16.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.