Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 756051334
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Corsicana, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9038722401
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,010,163
- Expenses
- $3,589,388
- Assets
- $2,300,459
- Liabilities
- $1,259,471
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTEN RUDD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAKESHEA BROWN (PRESIDENT (OUTGOING))
- PAM CORDER (PRESIDENT)
- REV DAIRY JOHNSON (PRESIDENT (OUTGOING))
- DANIEL EDWARDS SR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL EDWARDS SR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $285,944 total reported compensation
- AMY PEAVY (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $143,146 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of community services, inc. Is to provide support services that empower and enrich individuals, families and communities directly and through mutual collaborations with community partners leading to self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2023
Community transit service (cts) operates as a component of csi. Cts is a rural public transportation program that provides services for the ellis and navarro county area. Hours of operation are monday through saturday 5:00 a.m. To 7:00 p.m. Excluding holidays. Reservations are taken monday through friday from 8:00 a.m. To 4:00 p.m. The cts program was developed to provide safe and efficient transportation to the general public and to persons with special needs as specified by americans with disabilities act (ada) and as defined by contracts into which cts may enter. The buses have low floors so the first step is more accessible, and they are equipped with a wheelchair lift. The transit operators are trained to assist people with disabilities in boarding and securing their wheelchairs on the bus. By federal law, operators announce major transfer points, intersections, and destination points along each route.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.