Community Resource Centers of Texas Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470946288
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Marble Falls, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8306930700
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $866,612
- Expenses
- $1,032,540
- Assets
- $64,673
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LUCY MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ALLISON SMITH (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LUCY MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $108,558 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of community resource centers of Texas, inc. Is to serve communities by connecting people to resources that meet needs and change futures.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community resource centers of Texas, inc. ("crctx") operates buildings serving as one-stop social service outreach facilities serving blanco, burnet, llano and williamson counties with participating non-profit and state agencies all housed under one roof. Types of organizations in the buildings include food pantries, social service agencies, local government entities, employment agencies, etc. These office spaces are provided at no cost to the organizations. In 2024, crctx had agreements with 29 agencies across five locations. In addition to providing offices for organizations, crc's connects individuals to resources that help solve problems of poverty or need. In 2024, crctx and tenant agencies had over 46,411 client interactions.crctx also provides limited financial assistance for short-term needs, transportation assistance, store-to-door meal delivery programs, hotel vouchers for homeless individuals, and prescription drug and gas assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.4%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.2%; rating input score 93; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.4% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $628K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.