Cpcwa
Legal name: Community Psychiatric Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910621380
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2018
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2064613614
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,641,635
- Expenses
- $22,973,894
- Assets
- $47,484,761
- Liabilities
- $6,163,501
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- OREN LANG-FURR (President)
- DOUGLAS CRANDALL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BELINDA GUSTAFSON (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $224,474 total reported compensation
- DOUGLAS CRANDALL (CEO): $202,038 total reported compensation
- DAVID ROWLETT (PSYCHIATRIST): $181,784 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
While CPCWA provides educational guides and practical tools, some situations require additional or immediate support.
What it reported doing in 2018
Residential - services for mentally ill and the developmentally ill and the developmentally disabled in a group living environment and semi-independent living environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $18.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $224K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $881K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.