Community Progress Council Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231653135
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- York, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7178464600
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,655,261
- Expenses
- $13,031,435
- Assets
- $3,511,270
- Liabilities
- $1,185,878
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBIN ROHRBAUGH (PRESIDENT / CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBIN ROHRBAUGH (PRESIDENT / CEO): $184,752 total reported compensation
- RUTH ROBBINS (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $147,852 total reported compensation
- LINDA SPOON (CHIEF HR OFFICER (TIL 1/25)): $142,789 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community progress council, york county's community action agency, empowers individuals and families to move toward self-sufficiency and advocates for change to promote community growth.
What it reported doing in 2024
Intake and coaching, self-sufficiency program, foster granparents program: intake & coaching: resource navigators provide a crisis assessment of new participants to determine how to address any immediate needs. Participants work through a support plan and then are referred to a self-sufficiency coach or family coach to work on medium and long-term needs. All participants go through a cpc self-sufficiency assessment with a coach and discuss the following indicators: employment, education, income, transportation, childcare, housing, health insurance, and food security. By implementing the intake and coaching process, cpc has been able to ensure that all participants are provided comprehensive, integrated services to meet a variety of needs. The self-sufficiency program empowers and coaches low-income families to attain a family sustaining wage to achieve and maintain economic self-sufficiency and live free of public assistance. Cpc offers a 16-session facilitated conversation "getting ahead in a just getting by world" where participants investigate how poverty affects their lives and their communities. Through the conversation, participants examine their current situation, build resources, and create a plan for getting ahead. "getting ahead" graduates who are motivated and ready to transform their lives are invited to work intensively with a self-sufficiency coach to more fully develop a future story and create a concrete plan to move toward self-sufficiency. The self-sufficiency program is offered countywide and has received funding from the york county united way, powder mill foundation, york county community foundation, the rice family foundation and community services block grant through Pennsylvania department of community and economic development. Cpc served 6,726 clients through intake and resource navigation & 938 of those connected with ongoing coaching. The foster grandparent program provides a subsidized volunteer program for older adults to build positive relationships with children and youth based on sharing, communication, and trust. Individuals over the age of fifty-five, who meet federal income guidelines, are assigned to schools and head start centers throughout the county to provide one-one-one support for children with special needs. Funding is provided by the corporation for national and community service. The program served 50 clients during the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.2% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $304K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.