Community Prevention Coalition for Jackson County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331017099
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Gainesboro, TN, USA
Phone
9312684191
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$366,307
Expenses
$401,861
Assets
$14,350
Liabilities
$71,426

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To stop drug abuse through education.

What it reported doing in 2012

With the grants from Drug Free Communities we have provided educational materials, drug free youth alternative events and alcohol and tobacco related educational classes and enforcement. The goal is to reduce tobacco and alcohol abuse among the 12-25 age group. Project graduation (100% of highschool seniors in attendance) providing a drug free event and community awarness on graduation night. TN Teen Institute - Educational - allowing highschool age students to learn how to be leaders affecting change in their community involving alcohol and substance abuse and tobacco usage. sent 24 students. Youth alternative event at New Hope Baptist Church activity day. Est 175 persons in attendance in the age group. Spooky Hollow Mock Dui Skit is an annual community activity through the month of October. This activity strengthens the linkage with the Flynns Lick fire dept and the rescue squad and serves as a community awarness and educational project. Est 3850 persons in attendance - 75% in the age group. Compliance checks paying underage youth informants for their services. Also strengthens relations with law enforcement. Tobacco use prevention - staff facilitating court ordered tobacco cessation classes for juveniles. Strengthns relations with local judicial system. Classes in the middle school. est attendance 130. Americorps Partners in school success matches teh youth coalition service award - given to elected youth coalition as a senior service learning project - 8 students awarded. Maze of Terror - youth alternative event distributed materials and strengthen linkages and partnerships. Est 2500 in attendance - 75% in age group.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 31
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.98; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -62.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $402K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 5 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 29 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.