Community Partners in Revitalization Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264709795
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8138737300
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,171
Expenses
$9,773
Assets
$137,940
Liabilities
$37,247

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN LAMB (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN LAMB (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVE MOORE (TRUSTEE)
  • DAVID SNYDER (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the quality of life for low to moderate income individuals and families by developing strategies to reduce community blight through neighborhood stabilization and positive economic impact. Our goal is to increase neighborhood stabilization by providing sustainable, affordable, energy efficient housing, increase jobs, and promote community activities that improve the health, wealth and safety for children, individuals and families in the tampa bay area.

What it reported doing in 2020

Community partners in revitalization is a state of Florida licensed building contractor specializing in sustainable and affordable construction in order to benefit disadvantaged individuals. Cpr is also strongly committed to supporting the brave men and women of the military who were wounded in action during the wars in iraq or afghanistan. Cpr desires to serve those that have returned to the tampa bay area from the battlefield with severe wounds and disabilities. Our goal is to build mortgage free homes for these men and women who have loyally and courageously served our country. Cpr is making a significant difference in the lives of the severely wounded men and women of the military forces of the united states. We build new homes from the ground up to meet the unique needs of the injured service member who selflessly served our country. These mortgage-free, ada compliant homes not only help to remove the family's financial burden, they help to restore the individual's freedom, and enable the veteran to lead a more independent and productive civilian life. Our future plans include modifying existing homes through rehabilitiation of the property.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 88.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.11; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -27.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.