Community Nurses Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251623598
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
Location
St Marys, PA, USA
Phone
8008419397
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-4,170,141
Expenses
$180,363
Assets
$27,677,188
Liabilities
$26,090,882

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Mark Norman (Board Member/ COO PHH): $715,216 total reported compensation
  • Julianne Peer (Board Member/Pres PHB & PHE (Start 1/23/25)): $330,632 total reported compensation
  • Cheryl Mitchell (Service Line Director): $226,192 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide general management and administrative services for subsidiary affiliates, which are exempt, community-based home health care organizations. See schedule o for additional information

What it reported doing in 2024

Community nurses, inc. Provides management and administrative services for exempt, community-based home health care subsidiary organizations. Community nurses home health & hospice is a non-profit, medicare certified, state licensed, home health and hospice agency. Community nurses home support services is a non-profit, state licensed, home care, home support services, and adult day services provider. Services are provided for patients of all ages, from infants to the elderly, serving all of elk, cameron and mckean counties and parts of clearfield, jefferson and potter counties in Pennsylvania. A dedicated staff and an outstanding commitment to quality care have made community nurses, inc. And subsidiaries a well-respected leader in home health care in northwestern pa.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -104.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 153.45; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.94; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 196.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $157K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $715K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $355K reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 29 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.