Community Nurses Home Health & Hospice Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 250996070
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- St Marys, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8008419397
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,630,267
- Expenses
- $18,559,312
- Assets
- $26,865,399
- Liabilities
- $43,251,451
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Mark Norman (Director/ COO PHH): $715,216 total reported compensation
- Julianne Peer (PRES BROOKVILLE/ ELK (Start 1/23/25)): $330,632 total reported compensation
- Cheryl Mitchell (Service Line Director): $226,192 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide home health and hospice services, including skilled nursing, physical, speech and occupational therapy, and home health aide, nutrition, social work, and telehealth within a community-based, tax-exempt agency. (see schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization offers skilled home health care for the sick and injured to help people recover in the comfort of their homes. Home health services include skilled nursing, therapy, home health aide medical social services, diabetes education, nutrition counseling and telehealth services. They also provide hospice services, which focus on comfort and pain management for the patient and support for the entire family. The organization provided a total of 114,151 visits for 6,149 home health and hospice patients during the year ended 6/30/25. Additional community outreach programs include the annual flu injection clinics at the area senior centers and the senior outreach program to provide contact with isolated seniors and also common household supplies if the client so needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.2%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.61; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.2% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $715K · 9 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $461K reported
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 29 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.