Community Medical Center Healthcare System

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232279376
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Danville, PA, USA
Phone
5702716624
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$267,948
Expenses
$4,823,307
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • GLENN D STEELE JR MD PHD (FORMER OFFIC): $3,125,630 total reported compensation
  • FRANK J TREMBULAK (SR VP, TREAS): $1,827,584 total reported compensation
  • DAVID T FEINBERG MD MBA (PRES, CHAIR,): $1,774,453 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the activities of community medical center and affiliates.

What it reported doing in 2015

See schedule o community medical center healthcare system (cmchs) was incorporated in 1983 as a non-stock, not-for-profit corporation under the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is a irc code 501(c)(3) federal tax-exempt entity. Cmchs was formed for the purpose of conducting a variety of charitable, health, research, scientific, educational, and hospital activities. From 1983 until january 31, 2012, it was the sole member and corporate parent of the community medical center (cmc) dba geisinger community medical center, and mountain view nursing home dba mountain view care center (mvcc). Effective february 1, 2012, cmchs and its subsidiary corporations listed above were acquired by geisinger health, a non-stock, not-for profit corporation under the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and a 501(c)(3) federal tax-exempt entity under irc section 501(c)(3). Since the acquisition, cmchs continued to provide support to its affiliates. In fy 2016, cmchs contributed 4,839,750 to cmc. Effective june 30, 2016, cmchs ceased operations, and pursuant to its articles of incorporation, transferred assets to community medical center, one of its 501(c)(3) supported organizations, in furtherance of its exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,700.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 149.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -46.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 33 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 60 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.