Geisinger

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232429776
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2014
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Danville, PA, USA
Phone
5702716624
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$479,047
Expenses
$2,315,918
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • GLENN D STEELE JR MD PHD (PRES, CHAIR,): $4,760,306 total reported compensation
  • FRANK J TREMBULAK (SR VP, TREAS): $1,411,976 total reported compensation
  • KEVIN F BRENNAN CPA FHFMA (EVP, FINANCE): $1,230,135 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide the right care when and where it matters most.

What it reported doing in 2014

See schedule o community medical care, inc. ("cmci") was incorporated in 1983 as a non- stock, not-for-profit corporation under the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is a irc code 501(c)(3) federal tax-exempt entity. Cmci operates physician outpatient clinics to provide ambulatory patient medical and health services. During the course of the year the organization provided services to approximately 1,125 members of the community. Uncompensated care: cmci recognizes that its mission is to serve all the members of the community with respect to the provision of healthcare services and education. Cmci provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay. In this regard cmci provides free or subsidized care below cost and supports various health activities and programs in support of the community. A.charity care the primary concern of cmci is the delivery of health care to all the citizens of northeastern Pennsylvania, regardless of their ability to pay. The unreimbursed cost of charity care represents the cost cmci incurs by providing free or discounted services to those who cannot afford to pay. The cost to cmci of providing this charity care during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2015 was 44,729. B.medicare/medicaid/other governmental recognizing its mission to the community, services are provided to the elderly (medicare), the poor (medicaid), and other. Cmci provides care below cost to persons covered by these governmental programs. To the extent reimbursement is below the cost of providing healthcare, cmci is furthering its charitable mission. The unreimbursed value of medicare, medicaid and other governmental payers is equal to the cost of providing services less the amount received as reimbursement under the program. For fiscal year ended june 30, 2015, the unreimbursed cost of providing care to these patients was 632,815. C.other uncompensated patient services in addition, cmci provides other patient services for which full payment is not received. The uncompensated cost of providing such patient services during the fiscal year ended june 30, 2015 was 29,302. Community service summary: medicare/medicaid shortfall 632,815 charity care 44,729 uncompensated care 29,302 ----------- total 706,846

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 0
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -383.4%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 120.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -118% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4.8M · 30 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 46 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.