Community Mainstreaming Associates Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237448487
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Westbury, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5166830710
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Homes
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,521,194
- Expenses
- $22,732,294
- Assets
- $16,463,313
- Liabilities
- $8,797,270
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeffrey Fachler (Vice President)
- Maria Massei-Rosato (President)
- Eileen Egan (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Eileen Egan (Executive Director): $338,932 total reported compensation
- Minglan Cai (Chief Financial officer): $235,834 total reported compensation
- Jennifer Phillips (Chief Program officer-Community Program): $193,844 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CMA strives to maximize each person's potential to lead a fulfilling, purposeful life in the community by offering a full range of work, social, educational, and recreational opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
During 2024, cma provided a range of residential services to adult men and women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Services range from supportive living services to 24 hours per day supervised residential services, providing supports to enable the men and women to realize their full potential and be part of the community. Cma provides a variety of day services including day habilitation, community habilitation, supported employment and self directed services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 96
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $339K · 21 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.