Community Living Options Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371079626
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Galesburg, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3093431550
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,219,054
- Expenses
- $42,507,981
- Assets
- $159,189,342
- Liabilities
- $84,904,166
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN CROCK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN CROCK (PRESIDENT): $4,500 total reported compensation
- JOHN THOMPSON (SECRETARY): $4,500 total reported compensation
- FORREST LANGENFELD (ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $4,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes as defined in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended. In furtherance of those charitable purposes, the corporation shall be empowered to build, lease, acquire and otherwise own and operate residential facilities, nursing facilities and other related facilities and services for the elderly, mentally retarded, mentally ill, developmentally disabled and other like conditions without regard to race, religion, color, sex, creed or national origin of said persons. The corporation will not engage in the practice of medicine nor render any licensed professional services.
What it reported doing in 2024
All program services relate to providing and operating long-term care facilities and other related services to the developmentally disabled and the elderly. The organization owns 40 facilities and operates a combined total of 528 beds within those facilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.74; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 6 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $2.9M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.