Community Housing Partnership Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942938745
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
Phone
6022536905
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Shelters

Reported finances

Revenue
$884,545
Expenses
$1,340,353
Assets
$13,217,979
Liabilities
$220,561

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELAINE SAN SOUCI (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • NANCY MARION (EXECUTIVE DI): $115,000 total reported compensation
  • JKH CONSULTING LLC (FINANCE DIRE): $80,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Providing affordable housing for low-income families in the phoenix metro area.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community housing partnership, inc. (chp) is a 501 (c)(3), affordable housing program. Located in downtown phoenix chp offers low-income, and very low-income, housing to income qualifying families and individuals in its 109 units. Chp partners with other local agencies such as mesa united way (foster 360). Together we provide needed community services. Example, 7 two-bedroom chp condominiums were fully renovated and now host a program for youth aging out of the foster care system. Programming provides safe, affordable housing, life-skill instruction, education/ employment assistance, and financial literacy classes. The remaining 102 units are being renovated into dignified, energy- efficient, affordable units. Residents may apply for housing, review faq's, and see examples of interior remodels on the new chp website at www.chpaz.org. During this same time period, with the assistance of dedicated business partners, holiday meals/gifts, social service referrals, and personal hygiene products were supplied to not only residents of chp, but to local chronic homeless individuals still living on the streets.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -51.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.86; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $115K · 7 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $113K reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.