Community Housing Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311222236
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
6144876700
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,365,656
Expenses
$12,693,183
Assets
$79,089,039
Liabilities
$6,015,883

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA SHULER (CEO (EXITED 3.24.25))

Highest reported compensation

  • SAMANTHA SHULER (CEO (EXITED 3.24.25)): $270,752 total reported compensation
  • RYAN CASSELL (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $207,366 total reported compensation
  • DEAN SLOANE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $198,656 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We create homes that provide residents with the support, stability, and community connections they need to live and thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

Permanent supportive housing: community housing network (chn) is a nonprofit housing company that develops, owns and manages permanent supportive housing dedicated to vulnerable populations including people with mental health conditions, substance use disorders, and histories of homelessness. Since our beginning in 1987, chn's permanent supportive housing program has proven that vulnerable populations can live successfully in the community when their housing is connected to appropriate supportive services. Chn's housing allows residents to live stably, which in turn has positive effects on their health, productivity and connection to the community. In addition, once stably housed, chn's residents use fewer costly community resources like emergency health care and homeless shelters, generating significant cost savings to public systems. Today, chn provides over 1,600 permanent supportive housing units and is an integral part our community's effort to improve the lives of our most vulnerable citizens.chn provides all residents with a rent subsidy to ensure our housing is affordable, as well as safe, dependable, and well maintained. Chn also offers a continuum of supportive housing service models, including models with 24/7 onsite wellbeing monitoring, onsite services, resident managers and connections to communitybased social, health and employment services. In addition to its own services, chn engages with other service agencies to offer residents more access to behavioral health, wellness and employment services. Success is measured by length of stay in our housing, successful exits, including exits to more independent housing, being connected to asneeded supportive services, and increased income, including through employment. By including a safety net of services in all its housing, chn's housing equips residents with the tools they need to overcome obstacles in their lives and maintain stability. Stability allows residents to gain independence and begin to flourish, increasing their incomes and finding meaningful employment, building sustaining relationships, and reconnecting to their loved ones and communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.9%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.23; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.9% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $271K · 20 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.7M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.